Friday, June 8, 2012

Fanny and Alexander (1982) Directed By Ingmar Bergman




Astrid:
I saw Fanny and Alexander as a child. Therefore, I thought it was a fim suitable for children. Now I was shocked to find out it was K16 – I had bought the DVD to watch with a ten year old...I remembered the film as a sweet, beautiful and honest depiction of family, Christmas, tradition, beauty... I remembered the maid having sex with one of the family sons, but I still thought this was a feel-good film for kiddies.This whole misconception and the total failure of my memory seems somewhat crucial in thinking back on my childhood. Was I free of overprotection or was I in fact under-protected? It seemed to be a normal thing back then to go to a friend's house and watch a horror film or Bodyguard at the age of 8.

Memory is an unreliable living part of me. It changes and alters my reality, sometimes protecting me, other times exposing me to my past. As I relived Fanny and Alexander, I wonder why I was allowed to watch this film and where I saw it in the first place. Was it a great thing that I was not totally protected from the adult world growing up? That's what fascinated me about this film, peeking into secret lives of adults. This time I was baffled by the cruelty and fright present in the film; the dangerous murderous priest, the unhappiness that dried old people to the bone, the mysterious ghosts that haunted only children. Did I take all that for granted as a child or did I not notice?

Ingmar Bergman is a cinema god, his imagination is vast, decorous and completely truthful at the same time. We haven't written about his films here because we've had a subtitle problem (no English subtitles in the Scandinavian boxes). Still, I have gone through periods (summers) similar to my Allen moods, where I only watch Bergman films, so he has truly been neglected here. Fanny and Alexander shows Bergman's ability to empathize with his subjects and his unwillingness to simplify characters, stories or life at large. Events move from one to another seamlessly, never releasing the viewer from tension even though places and people change. It all flows like liquid. If I could choose a director for my biopic, it would be B.

Nick:
I was in this shop today that  recently opened in Helsinki called Tiger. It's a Swedish brand and it's basically a high class version of your classic Euro store or Everything-for-a-pound shop. So we blew some money on nonsense we don't need (black candles, picture frames etc.). Astrid made the comment that the store is without ethics and therefore shouldn't be supported. Rather like Ikea, H&M and a few other Swedish consumer ideas the people that make the goods in these stores don't get paid. It's the new liberalism that Sweden is exporting around the world. Exploitation of cheap labor without guilt. As trade and consumerism reach the end of their natural cycle, Sweden is just honestly saying, "Here, it's cheap, don't worry where it came from, looks nice eh?" It's hard to fault the casual Swedish way. I am constantly struggling to earn a living right now, yet I can easily blow some Euros on goods descended from some far off sweatshop. And, it's not as if the rest of the world isn't doing the same eh? Why am I holding the Swedes up as an example?

Well,  two wrongs dont make a right and maybe I'm just purging my own guilt caused by some useless consumerism. Maybe living in Finland for many years has meant that the feelings of inferiority as regards Sweden felt by Finns is finally rubbing off on me. Of course, amongst many other pursuits, I can always go to the films of Ingmar Bergman for validity of Swedish goodness and ignore the modern consumer injustices of the world. Another film about aristocracy and the rich, us have not's obsession. Fanny and Alexander however is never in awe of the wealth or judgmental of it, it merely is there. If anything the movie rather humanizes these well-off  Swedish denizens. Fanny and Alexander further more never patronizes the audience, it just merely involves us in these lives, regardless of class.

I haven't watched so many Bergman movies (Seventh Seal, Wild Strawberries, Cries & Whispers). But those that I have are astonishing. Bergman musing on the human condition always seems revelatory to me. But he also shows me a genuine humor and humility about the Swedish people that I find truly humbling and recalls a great feeling I get whenever I visit the country. Fanny and Alexander is far more modern than I realized (I always thought it was a 1970's picture). Its brilliant tales of the Ekdal family and the sometimes traumatic experiences of the young children Fanny and Alexander, still feel like nothing else out there. This is cinema in its essence.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Pierrot le Fou (1965) Directed by Jean-Luc Godard


Astrid:
As I have stated before in this blog, Jean-Paul Belmondo, Anna Karina and Jean-Luc Godard have an almost holy place in my cinematic heart. To see and experience life as Pierrot Le Fou is to really live – or so I have thought. That's been the innocent child-like view of mine. Cynically speaking, Godard's films from this period offer a vast visual resource pool for any young blogger wanting to tap into effortless cool. His films also offer an air of intellectualism, name dropping and they mix fairytale with essaying about art. This complexity is second nature to Godard. Who cares if anyone can follow a plot from beginning to end in some coherent linear way, at least you can congratulate yourself for recognizing at least ten names of film makers, philosophers and poets mentioned in any given Godard movie...

The reason why none of the snobbism gets to me in Pierrot Le Fou is Anna Karina with Jean-Paul Belmondo. Their acting looks like the most fun kind of playing, spontaneous and unexpected. Not only do they look amazing in their clothes and without their clothes, they have a sense of humor about themselves. Nothing is too serious. Not even this movie. This time around I didn't really care much for the plot of this film. I was bothering to try and understand what motivated the two characters, but did not come up with anything rewarding in the end. In my mind I had also mixed up a couple of other Godard films with this one and created my own story thus looking for scenes in Pierrot Le Fou that never take place.

A suspicion smoulders in my mind that maybe Godard is somewhat resentful towards his always stunning leading ladies. He seems to portray these women as cunning, deceitful, confusing, mysterious and deathly. It is always the women who drive the men to trouble bigger than they can cope with. And it is the women who stop loving the men first. Godard's attitude to women as dubious femme fatales is something I've never thought of before and now that I have started, this idea disturbs me a little.
Ultimately, I would like to remain a woman who can watch Pierrot Le Fou without too much analyzing, just for its visual impact and occasional emotional reward too.

Nick
:
In the annals of looking cool with a cigarette dangling from between your lips, there have been many wannabe champions of the art. In popular song, David Bowie, Bryan Ferry and Serge Gainsbourg have all tried to master this pose. Humphrey Bogart & Elliott Gould as a certain dick called Marlowe have improved the pose compared to their rockstar counterparts. Many others have tried this look, but the undisputed king is Jean-Paul Belmondo. Just watching the fat Gauloises hang from those luscious lips is enough to make you wanna strike one up. Yummy. Sexual. It's a shame I dont do that anymore.



Godard understands the power of "Chercher La Femme" and in Pierrot le Fou he realizes that Belmondo's love for Marianne Renoir (Anna Karina) like his own love for Karina is doomed. It's all over Pierrot le Fou and in the subsequent movies he directed Karina in. He's telling us you can dream about someone like that but you'll never have someone like that. Belmondo as Ferdinand, Pierrot or himself is as cool as screen males ever have been or ever will be. But he's no match for Karina. Pierrot le Fou has more ideas in it than most of popular culture combined and then some. It's still radical, sexy and pretentious. But as it gets older, Pierrot le Fou starts to resemble something even more classic in cinema. The look is spectacular in an oddly conventional way. The use of color and the cut-up soundtrack somehow recall a vintage quality.

If I were to compare this to an album I'd say it's a White Light/ White Heat or a Before Hollywood. Does that enlighten you much? A Scott 4 or New York Tendaberry perhaps? Can I make this easier for you? In these postmodern times I can suggest A River Ain't Too Much To Love or Wu-Tang Forever? Pierrot le Fou is not like these albums at all in any way. The film just leaves me with the same feeling, that's all. I'm just trying to say you should see this if you have not. Life's too short and Pierrot le Fou is one of its pleasures.